
Supplier Shortlists
Part of Responsible and resilient sourcing
Mapping dependence on one factory or material
Trace a product to critical factories and inputs, identify shared dependencies and record where an interruption could affect supply.
Map a product’s route through the production site and the inputs that could stop it being made. Two sellers are not independent alternatives if both rely on the same critical site or material. The useful output is a dated map showing the dependency, affected demand and what remains unconfirmed.
Start with the product
Choose a product or group of variants whose interruption matters. Record the approved specification, forecast demand for your planning period, usable stock and the date more goods are needed. Keep forecasts labelled as forecasts.
Ask the seller who performs each critical production step and where. Identify the material, component, tooling or specialist process on which that step depends. Record the seller separately from the production site. If an upstream source cannot be named, show the last confirmed point and the missing link.
Map field / What to record
- Product
- Affected SKU, variant and approved version
- Dependency
- Site, input, tool or process and its role
- Basis
- Document, checked observation or supplier statement
- Exposure
- Affected demand and usable stock
- Substitution
- What might change and whose approval is needed
- Confidence
- Confirmed, supplier-stated or unknown; date checked
Find shared points of failure
Compare routes across products and sellers. Different sellers may use one factory; several factories may rely on one specialised input. Ask rather than assume.
Draw each priority route as critical input → production step → finished goods → receiving point and mark where routes meet. If the supplier cannot identify which orders or variants use a shared node, leave the affected proportion open.
For example, two hypothetical pouch sellers might use the same specified closure. The map would flag a source to verify; it would not establish that the sellers actually share one.
Supply Chain Risk: Single vs Multiple Sources
- Single Source DependencyHigh risk: one factory or material affects multiple products; interruption impacts entire supply chain
- Multiple Independent SourcesLower risk: diverse suppliers and inputs reduce single points of failure; better resilience
- Shared Inputs (e.g., closure for pouches)Even with different sellers, reliance on same input creates hidden risk – requires verification
Estimate the consequence
For each dependency, compare usable stock and credible replenishment timing with the date goods are needed. List the work a substitute would require: sourcing an input, assessing a changed product, arranging production and receiving stock. Record uncertain durations separately. A supplier estimate is not reserved capacity or a guaranteed recovery date.
The Australian Government Department of Industry, Science and Resources has an Office of Supply Chain Resilience. For a buyer, the practical question is whether stock can cover an interruption, or an unavailable input needs earlier action.
Finish with a priority list naming the dependency, affected goods, evidence confidence, possible shortage point, next question and owner. Refresh it when a site, material or demand forecast changes.
Key Metrics for Dependency Mapping
- Usable Stock Level
- Current inventory available for use
- Replenishment Lead Time
- Time to source and receive replacement input (uncertain durations noted separately)
- Next Order Date
- Date when additional goods are required
- Confidence Level
- Confirmed / Supplier-stated / Unknown (date checked)



